Feed on
Posts
Comments
Tumblr

Last night’s “town hall” style debate between Senators Obama and McCain got me to thinking about what question I would have posed.  And about the answer that would satisfy me.  Much has been made of the first 100 days of President Franklin Roosevelt’s administration.  

From Wikipedia:

Having won a decisive victory in the United States presidential election of 1932, and with his party having decisively swept Congressional elections across the nation, Roosevelt entered office with unprecedented political capital. Americans of all political persuasions were demanding immediate action, and Roosevelt responded with a remarkable series of new programs in the “first hundred days” of the administration, in which he met with congress for 100 days. During those 100 days of lawmaking, Congress granted every “request” Roosevelt asked.

While I don’t expect either candidate to arrive in office with a mandate like FDR had, I do expect them to have a plan laid out and a willingness to execute it to the best of their ability.  So, here then is my question.

What, in order of priority, are the top five initiatives you’ll implement during your first 100 days in office?

I’ve thought about this a lot in the past couple of days, and here are some of the initiative I would hope to hear.

  1. An executive order closing the Guantanimo Bay detention facility.  The order should also require that all persons detained be formally charged and given representation or set free
  2. An executive order forbidding the use of torture (or “aggressive interrogation techniques”).
  3. An initiative to bring forward the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) Standards.  Within four years no car sold in America should get less then 30 MPG average.
  4. Signing and full compliance with the Kyoto Protocol regarding global climate change.
  5. A proposal presented to Congress that details a responsible withdrawal of troops from Iraq within the next two years.
  6. A “bailout” or relief plan for homeowners caught in the sub-prime mortgage crisis.  We’ve helped the banks who created the mess, now let’s help the ordinary citizens.
  7. Strong, unwavering diplomacy with those nations whose ambitions include nuclear weapons, including a clear statement of consequences should diplomacy fail.
  8. A clear, unambiguous path for persons living in the United States to become citizens - regardless of how they arrived in this country.  
  9. Regulation and monitoring of the Pharmaceutical and Health Insurance industries.
  10. Legislation taking away the “free speech” power of money, thus removing the power corporations have that citizens don’t enjoy.
This list could go on and on.  The point is, after all the campaign rhetoric, after all the mudslinging, after the debates are analyzed, and all the votes are counted, we will have a new President.  A no matter who fills that office, he will have to form coalitions in order to make things happen.  Coalitions within our government, and coalitions with the rest of the world community.  America cannot “go it alone” anymore.  Eight years of unilateral bullying haven’t improved the world, or the United States’ standing.  The next President will face one of the hardest four years this country has seen in decades.  It will be impossible to serve this four year term without upsetting every faction in every corner of the globe at least once.  Only by having a plan, by knowing what the objectives are, by being willing to engage in open, frank discussions will the next President have any hope at all of steering this country back towards stability, integrity, and prosperity.

Endorsement

I’ve already linked to this endorsement in the Delicious section of my sidebar, but I wanted to draw further attention to what the New Yorker had to say about Senator Barack Obama.  On issues ranging from health care, taxation, energy, America’s position in the global community, Iraq, and the future of the judiciary, Senator Obama is the right choice.

My Dear American Friend

Terrific send up of those 419 scams from Africa.  Originally seen here.

MY DEAR AMERICAN FRIEND:

I AM NEEDING TO ASK YOU TO SUPPORT AN URGENT SECRET BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH A TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF GREAT MAGNITUDE.

I AM MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY OF THE REPUBLIC OF AMERICA. MY COUNTRY HAS HAD CRISIS THAT HAS CAUSED NEED FOR LARGE TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF 700 BILLION OF YOUR DOLLARS (US). IF YOU WOULD ASSIST ME IN THIS TRANSFER IT WOULD BE MOST PROFITABLE TO YOU.

I AM WORKING WITH HIGHLY REPUTABLE MR. PHIL GRAM, LOBBYIST FOR UBS, WHO WILL BE MY REPLACEMENT AS MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY IN JANUARY IF MY POLITICAL PARTY WINS UPCOMING ELECTION, WHICH WE CERTAINLY WILL BECAUSE WE ARE IN CONTROLING OF THE HIGHEST SUPREME COURT. YOU MAY REMEMBER HIM AS A SENATOR AS LEADER OF THE AMERICAN BANKING DEREGULATION MOVEMENT IN THE 1990S.

I AM ALSO WORKING WITH HIGHLY REPUTABLE MR. BARNEY FRANK, MEMBER OF CONGRESS FROM PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF MASSACHUSETTS, WHO WILL BE MY REPLACEMENT AS MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY IN JANUARY IF OTHER POLITICAL PARTY, LED BY MR. BARACK OBAMA, WIN UPCOMING ELECTION, WHICH HE CERTAINLY WILL BECAUSE HE IS IN CONTROLLING OF VOTING IN ILLINOIS, OHIO, FLORIDA, AND MANY OTHER STATES. MR. BARNEY FRANK IS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OF ALL KINDS, FROM WHOREHOUSE ADMINISTRATION TO HOME LOAN BUSINESS, AND FAITHFULLY TEACHES PRECEPTS OF MR. BARACK OBAMA (”FROM TINY A.C.O.R.N. GROWS GIANT FORECLOSURE OAK!”).

THIS TRANSACTIN IS 100% SAFE. YOU MUST TRUST ME COMPLETELY AND NOT ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRANSACTION. YOU HAVE MY WORD NO ONE WILL DO ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE MONEY. THIS IS A MATTER OF GREAT URGENCY. WE NEED YOUR BLANK CHECK. WE NEED THE FUNDS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. WE CANNOT DIRECTLY TRANSFER THESE FUNDS IN THE NAMES OF OUR CLOSE FRIENDS BECAUSE WE ARE CONSTANTLY UNDER SURVEILLANCE. MY FAMILY LAWYER ADVISED ME THAT I SHOULD LOOK FOR A RELIABLE AND TRUSTWORTH PERSONAGE WHO WILL ACT AS A NEXT OF KIN SO THE FUNDS CAN BE TRANSFERRED.

YOU ARE THAT PERSONAGE.

PLEASE REPLY WITH ALL OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT, IRA AND COLLEGE FUND ACCOUNT NUMBERS AND THOSE OF YOUR CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN AND THOSE YET UNBORN TO WALLSTREETBAILOUT@ TREASURY. GOV SO THAT WE MAY TRANSFER YOUR COMMISSION FOR THIS TRANSACTION.

AFTER I RECEIVE THIS INFORMATION I WILL RESPOND WITH DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT SAFEGUARDS WE PROMISE WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE FUNDS AND PRODUCE A LONG-TERM RETURN ON INVESTMENT FOR YOU AND THOSE YOU LOVE.

YOURS FAITHFULLY

MINISTER OF TREASURY H. PAULSON

P.S.: YOU CAN REALLY TRUST ME. LOOK AT DOLLAR BILL. MY SIGNATURE IS ON THE MONEY.

Yesterday the $700 Billion bailout of Wall Street was signed by President Bush.  Like many Americans I felt scared and uncertain about the financial crisis and the need to do something about it.  We won’t know for sometime whether history will see this as an intelligent response to the situation, or a knee-jerk reaction. However, it is done.

We’ve only taken care of half of the problem; many of the home owners who were given sub-prime mortgages still face foreclosure and our economy will continue to suffer as a result.  To my way of thinking there were two parties involved in each and every one of the sub-prime mortgages written: the bank and the home owner. The bailout comes to the aid of the banks but not to the people like Addie Polk.

If we are going to pat the banks on the head and say, “There, there, it’s alright,” and then invest up to $700 Billion a year into restoring them to financial stability, then we ought to do the same for the home owners. Both parties sat down at the table and agreed to these mortgages.  The banks approved them knowing full well that many if not all of the people they were lending to couldn’t afford the mortgage and would likely end up in foreclosure. Because the financial institution planned on selling off the mortgage they were willing to break or bend their lending rules.  Initially the bank profited from this action.  Why now, should the home owner, who also initially profited from this arrangement, by the only one who isn’t bailed out?

The argument seems to be that institutions are worth saving.  If we allow them to go bankrupt or allow consolidation, we will alter the landscape of the financial industry and that may have long lasting effects on our economy.  I guess if you are an individual taxpayer you aren’t as important to our economy as an institution.  You are important enough to have to pay for the institutions mistakes, however.

If I sell my used car to another individual, knowing it has a flaw, I can be made to pay for the repair and or return their money.  If, however, I sell that same vehicle to a dealer and they don’t notice the problem, they are stuck with it.  Since they are considered the expert in the transaction they aren’t protected like an individual.  In the case of sub-prime mortgages, the bank was (or should have been) the expert - and yet we bailed them out.

The $700 Billion bailout of Wall Street is a start, it may even be a good start.  But it is at best, only a start.  We need to restore the individuals too.

links for 2008-09-26

links for 2008-09-25

Or in this case, the man behind the Palin or Wall Street bailout negotiation.  The Republicans and the McCain campaign have done a masterful job of changing the subject of this Presidential election.  For weeks not it hasn’t been about John McCain and Barack Obama, it has been about Sarah Palin instead.  And now that the initial infatuation with the “hockey mom” is starting to fade, Senator McCain has announced that he is suspending his campaign in order to focus on the Wall Street bailout.

Excuse me?

The President of the United States has to deal with dozens of issues simultaneously.  America’s issues don’t neatly line up and wait their turn in line.  The chief executive must be able to prioritize and delegate, and at times not be involved in issues.  If a candidate can’t manage his or her current duties (senator or governor) along with a campaign, then perhaps they hadn’t ought to be a candidate.

McCain’s move smacks of theater and slight-of-hand parlor tricks.  Yes, the current state of America’s economy is a critical issue.  For the current administration as well as the new one starting in January 2009. A debate between the candidates focusing on economic policies and agendas would be highly appropriate and timely.  

The threat of not appearing at the first Presidential debate is the same kind of insidious behavior those people who tease and taunt employ.  When called on their action or remark they always say, “That isn’t what I meant.  How could you think that of me!?”  When everyone knows that the taunt was meant in the hurtful or insidious way.  John McCain’s threat to not appear isn’t about a concern for the American people or our economy.  It is simply another campaign parlor trick designed to keep us, the voters, from seeing the truth about this man and what he ultimately means for America.

If John McCain can’t show up for the debate then there is no reason for him to show up on election day either.

Tweaking

One of the best parts about having your own website is the endless opportunity for tweaking and fiddling.  I’ve gone back and forth a couple of time on how to incorporate links I’ve posted to my delicious account; should they be in a “links of the day” posting, or just captured in the sidebar.  I’m not happy with the posting style since the links aren’t really mine.  Yes, they are items that caught my attention that I wanted to share, but they weren’t written by me.  So, once again (and hopefully for all time now), I’ve moved the delicious links to the sidebar.  I’ve also moved them a bit higher in the sidebar, to give them some added prominence.

The only downside to the sidebar location is that readers such as yourself won’t be able to add comments.  My site gets so few comments, however, that I am not really too concerned about losing this feedback channel.

links for 2008-09-24

links for 2008-09-23

Older Posts »